Search found 23 matches
- Sun Feb 14, 2010 12:28 pm
- Forum: NESemdev
- Topic: Galaxian is too small for iNES
- Replies: 53
- Views: 14425
I have given a good thought about Membler's suggestion of using bank size of 0 to indicate the undersized dump. Then, I figured out that there is one very big flaw of this system. You see, this system requires the rom to be properly dumped. Think what would happen if the rom is over dumped. On the i...
- Fri Feb 12, 2010 11:37 am
- Forum: NESemdev
- Topic: Remapping of the mapper 159
- Replies: 0
- Views: 1568
Remapping of the mapper 159
The mapper 159, which is for some Bandai games, has the following known dumps: Dragon Ball Z - Kyoushuu! Saiya Jin (Japan) Magical Taruruuto-kun 2 - Mahou Daibouken (Japan) Magical Taruruuto-kun - Fantastic World!! (Japan) Magical Taruruuto-kun - Fantastic World!! (Japan) (Rev 1) SD Gundam Gaiden - ...
- Thu Feb 11, 2010 4:14 am
- Forum: NESemdev
- Topic: Galaxian is too small for iNES
- Replies: 53
- Views: 14425
- Wed Feb 10, 2010 11:52 am
- Forum: NESemdev
- Topic: Galaxian is too small for iNES
- Replies: 53
- Views: 14425
It was just my suggestion that if we're going to make a mapper for undersize NROM, we might as well use this opportunity to handle all known undersize NROM at the same time. Sure, if everyone agrees on it, I'm in. But other thing now to think about is that this will limit the CHR size to 255kb at m...
- Wed Feb 10, 2010 8:22 am
- Forum: NESemdev
- Topic: Galaxian is too small for iNES
- Replies: 53
- Views: 14425
- Wed Feb 10, 2010 8:03 am
- Forum: NESemdev
- Topic: Galaxian is too small for iNES
- Replies: 53
- Views: 14425
- Tue Feb 09, 2010 10:53 pm
- Forum: NESemdev
- Topic: Galaxian is too small for iNES
- Replies: 53
- Views: 14425
I kinda liked the idea of # of PRG banks being zero, because it is both pin-compatible and within reason to use an 8kB ROM on any 28-pin board. I'm pretty sure there never will be a cartridge with 0kB of PRG memory. Alternatively, zero could just mean to repeat it until memory is full, whatever siz...
- Tue Feb 09, 2010 9:13 am
- Forum: NESemdev
- Topic: Galaxian is too small for iNES
- Replies: 53
- Views: 14425
- Tue Feb 09, 2010 7:15 am
- Forum: NESemdev
- Topic: Galaxian is too small for iNES
- Replies: 53
- Views: 14425
- Mon Feb 08, 2010 6:24 pm
- Forum: NESemdev
- Topic: Galaxian is too small for iNES
- Replies: 53
- Views: 14425
- Mon Feb 08, 2010 10:02 am
- Forum: NESemdev
- Topic: Galaxian is too small for iNES
- Replies: 53
- Views: 14425
I think it's lame, among other reasons, because it makes the meaning of the PRG-ROM size byte less correct. What if an emulator uses the number of banks to load the data from the file before looking at the mapper number? I have two answers for your comment. 1) If the emulator uses the number of ban...
- Mon Feb 08, 2010 8:28 am
- Forum: NESemdev
- Topic: Galaxian is too small for iNES
- Replies: 53
- Views: 14425
I think he is suggesting that whenever this new mapper number is used, the number of PRG-ROM pages is completely ignored and 8KB is assumed. I think that's a pretty lame solution and a waste of a mapper number. Why are you calling it lame and waste? The iNES header curruntly supports 256 maximum ma...
- Mon Feb 08, 2010 12:58 am
- Forum: NESemdev
- Topic: Galaxian is too small for iNES
- Replies: 53
- Views: 14425
- Sun Feb 07, 2010 10:32 pm
- Forum: NESemdev
- Topic: Galaxian is too small for iNES
- Replies: 53
- Views: 14425
As I see it, the pragmatic solution is to say that if there are 16384 bytes of PRG, and the first 8192 match the last 8192, we have an NROM-128, an 8 KiB PRG ROM, and A13 not connected. Adding a new mapper number for NROM-128 in this most obvious 8 KiB configuration would require a rewrite of all i...
- Sun Feb 07, 2010 9:05 pm
- Forum: NESemdev
- Topic: Galaxian is too small for iNES
- Replies: 53
- Views: 14425