Why is the SNES on screen color pallete so small?

Discussion of hardware and software development for Super NES and Super Famicom. See the SNESdev wiki for more information.
Forum rules
  • For making cartridges of your Super NES games, see Reproduction.
GValiente
Posts: 34
Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2022 12:17 am

Re: Why is the SNES on screen color pallete so small?

Post by GValiente »

Oziphantom wrote: Thu Sep 05, 2024 2:11 am
GValiente wrote: Wed Sep 04, 2024 11:38 pm
Pokun wrote: Wed Sep 04, 2024 3:24 pmIn fact I think the SNES was about the only time when the more powerful system won a console war.
N-Gage and GP32 don't count?
N-Gage No, doesn't count, its in the technically competition, but well within Basically none. We could argue the 3310 though, snake did have a lot of playtime, but not really.
N-Gage was half mobile phone, half handheld.
It was released worldwide (unlike the GP32) two years after the GBA and it seems 64 games were released in physical format.
It 100% counts as competition IMO.
93143 wrote: Thu Sep 05, 2024 3:19 am
GValiente wrote: Wed Sep 04, 2024 11:38 pmPS4 doesn't count?
Switch is apparently considered 8th-gen. And it beat the PS4's sales numbers the same way the SNES beat the MD - by staying on the market longer to make up for a late start.
If the Switch is the winner of the PS4 gen, the Game Boy is the winner of the NES gen :mrgreen:
tepples
Posts: 22994
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 11:12 pm
Location: NE Indiana, USA (NTSC)

Re: Why is the SNES on screen color pallete so small?

Post by tepples »

GValiente wrote: Wed Sep 04, 2024 11:38 pm
Pokun wrote: Wed Sep 04, 2024 3:24 pmAnd maybe the GBA, if it counts at all as it basically didn't have any competition in the portable market.
N-Gage and GP32 don't count?
N-Gage launched at $299,[1] which I doubt many parents could afford for a toy. GBA was outselling it 100 to 1 during launch month.[2]

I don't remember having seen GP32 or GP2X on store shelves in the United States.

[1] "The 10 Worst-Selling Handhelds of All Time" by Blake Snow in GamePro
[2] "N-Gage Moves Under 5,000 Units" by David Smith in 1UP
GValiente
Posts: 34
Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2022 12:17 am

Re: Why is the SNES on screen color pallete so small?

Post by GValiente »

tepples wrote: Thu Sep 05, 2024 7:32 am
GValiente wrote: Wed Sep 04, 2024 11:38 pm
Pokun wrote: Wed Sep 04, 2024 3:24 pmAnd maybe the GBA, if it counts at all as it basically didn't have any competition in the portable market.
N-Gage and GP32 don't count?
N-Gage launched at $299,[1] which I doubt many parents could afford for a toy. GBA was outselling it 100 to 1 during launch month.
N-Gage was half mobile phone, half handheld, so I doubt it was meant to be sold as a toy.
PSP was also $100 more expensive than the NDS, but they were competition, right?
For me N-Gage was competition for the GBA like the Lynx was competition for the original Game Boy.
Oziphantom
Posts: 1980
Joined: Tue Feb 07, 2017 2:03 am

Re: Why is the SNES on screen color pallete so small?

Post by Oziphantom »

GValiente wrote: Thu Sep 05, 2024 4:00 am
Oziphantom wrote: Thu Sep 05, 2024 2:11 am
GValiente wrote: Wed Sep 04, 2024 11:38 pm
N-Gage and GP32 don't count?
N-Gage No, doesn't count, its in the technically competition, but well within Basically none. We could argue the 3310 though, snake did have a lot of playtime, but not really.
N-Gage was half mobile phone, half handheld.
It was released worldwide (unlike the GP32) two years after the GBA and it seems 64 games were released in physical format.
It 100% counts as competition IMO.
I've actually played on one. Did it attempt to compete with the GBA yes, did it compete, not really. It was destroyed in the market so fast and was a flop, the GBA destroyed it. Hence Technically it was competition, but basically it wasn't it. Basically the GBA had 92%+ of the market share at the height of its reign. It's biggest competitor would have been the Gameboy Color. followed by the Wonderswan. maybe then the Neo Geo Pocket
Looking it up
the GP32 sold 30,000
the N-Gage sold 3 million
the Wonderswan sold 3.5 million
the GBA sold 81.51 million
GValiente
Posts: 34
Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2022 12:17 am

Re: Why is the SNES on screen color pallete so small?

Post by GValiente »

Oziphantom wrote: Thu Sep 05, 2024 8:12 am
GValiente wrote: Thu Sep 05, 2024 4:00 am
Oziphantom wrote: Thu Sep 05, 2024 2:11 am
N-Gage No, doesn't count, its in the technically competition, but well within Basically none. We could argue the 3310 though, snake did have a lot of playtime, but not really.
N-Gage was half mobile phone, half handheld.
It was released worldwide (unlike the GP32) two years after the GBA and it seems 64 games were released in physical format.
It 100% counts as competition IMO.
I've actually played on one. Did it attempt to compete with the GBA yes, did it compete, not really. It was destroyed in the market so fast and was a flop, the GBA destroyed it. Hence Technically it was competition, but basically it wasn't it. Basically the GBA had 92%+ of the market share at the height of its reign. It's biggest competitor would have been the Gameboy Color. followed by the Wonderswan. maybe then the Neo Geo Pocket
Looking it up
the GP32 sold 30,000
the N-Gage sold 3 million
the Wonderswan sold 3.5 million
the GBA sold 81.51 million
The Lynx sold two million (one less than the N-Gage) and it competed with the Game Boy.

Failed or not, the N-Gage was competition for the GBA.
Drag
Posts: 1708
Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2004 2:57 pm

Re: Why is the SNES on screen color pallete so small?

Post by Drag »

The GBA had competitors but barely any competition.

When the front-runner of the race is a mile ahead, first place has no competition even though there's other competitors in the race.

Also, this entire console wars discussion is off topic.
Fiskbit
Site Admin
Posts: 1382
Joined: Sat Nov 18, 2017 9:15 pm

Re: Why is the SNES on screen color pallete so small?

Post by Fiskbit »

This is a high-activity, low-quality thread that wasn't great before the bump and is quickly devolving after the bump. Console wars aren't an acceptable topic; we've had enough of that here already and it's not productive. After discussion with staff, we're opting to lock this thread.