josete2k wrote:Yes, but the time for battery switch is essential...
As a friend explained to me, maybe the sram data is placed too near to the beginning of memory and a slow battery switch could destroy some bits.
He made a custom pcb for that game and when using 70ns sram all data are lost, soon or later. All is working better (not perfectly) with 120ns sram...
This is because the -12 sram needs a lower power from battery to get the stand-by mode and in the switching time it keeps the data better than -70 do.
Although I believe this is the case in your situation, the speed grade does not imply anything about how much quiescent current is uses. It depends on the series of chip, the manufacturer, the date of manufacture, etc. In other words, some SRAM chips were made to be more low power than others, independent of access speed. Certain series of SRAM chips also are safer to bring down to a lower voltage than others.
Good luck finding all this information nowadays. It isn't so organized, and a lot of stock is going to be pulls (used parts). Your best bet is anything that says Low Power SRAM, but even then it would help to consult the datasheet.
Also, SRAM doesn't lose data sequentially starting from the beginning. So there's no particular spot a number should be. It's just going to be random bit flips wherever, maybe in a certain pattern for that particular chip (most bits of certain rows or columns that would tend to go one way or the other), but mostly random if we're talking generalities across a lot of samples.