I tend to use VirtualDub as much as possible, but when it comes to deinterlacing I really prefer that the hardware capture device do it natively. To date I have yet to see a software deinterlacer do even a remotely decent job, and it's all because they're working with "post-rendered" results (dunno what else to call it). Things work a hell of a lot better if the actual hardware handling the video signal is what handles the deinterlacing correctly -- that Firewire/DV capture box I have actually does a great job deinterlacing (I used it do save a lot of old VHS recordings that look quite nice), but the last time I used that was like 8-9 years ago, and my PC now doesn't have Firewire nor do I have room for an expansion card, hence new product.tokumaru wrote:I'm pretty sure all cheap capture devices you can find nowadays will display/capture NES video as interlaced, at least with the bundled software. But you can use VirtualDub or some other tool to convert it back to 60Hz 240p after capturing.
The device I bought claims to do up to 60fps in a multitude of modes, but I always take those claims with a grain of salt (meaning some jackass at the company probably tested HDMI 1080p @ 60fps, was able to do it, and thus said "say we support it, ship it" but probably didn't test anything else). That's what I mean by "it's always a crap shoot". I guess I'll be finding out soon enough. If the product turns out to be crap I can always return it and try this instead.
I remember seeing some (free) Japanese software that supposedly worked wonderfully but also cannot remember it's name. Just remember if you recommend anything, please ensure it works on Windows XP. (The product I was going to buy, which was recommended to me by literally 4 different people, doesn't support XP, which is why I bought what I did).tokumaru wrote:There is a free (open source?) capture software though, that is able to display and capture the video correctly. I can't remember its name right now... I'll see if I can find it again, if I do I'll post the name here. Anyway, this program treated the video correctly, but it was far from perfect... It was pretty unstable, crashed a lot. While setting it up, 50% of the choices I made caused the program to close.