Bruce Lee vs Mike Tyson

[WedNESday]

Here are the conditions:

- Both men are in their prime.
- Both men fight until the other is knocked out.
- Neither is wearing any gloves or protective gear. Just 'casual' street clothes.
- There are no rounds.
- Both men have to stick to their respective skills. This is a fight about a boxer against a martial artist.

I'll put up my own personal opinion later on as not to influence. People are allowed to change their vote if they want if they change their minds.

Edit: Please post why below!

[Tormenter]

Lee, easily.

[tepples]

Settling discussions like this was one of the aims of UFC in its early days. (Its other aim was promotion of Brazilian jujitsu.)

[WedNESday]

Lee, easily.

Please say why.

[zzo38]

Lee, easily.

Please say why.

Because he is a martial artist, I suppose. I don't really know enough either to answer, but my guess is also Lee.

[Tormenter]

Lee, easily.

Please say why.

Well, if they have to fight in their own styles as the description says, Tyson can only punch, Waist up. Lee has many, many more weapons at his disposal.

[ShaneM]

Bruce Lee would win because he was swifter than Tyson also having an edge in martial arts. Another thing is he had more strength. Muscle mass does not necessarily equal strength (Tyson having more muscle mass).

Source: As a weight lifter, I focus on building mass rather than strength. Repetition builds mass while heavy weight training builds strength. --ShaneM



A picture with my 17" natural biceps.

[Drew Sebastino]

You know ShaneM, if you programed for the GBA, you could be called the master of ARM.