Espozo wrote:Hydroelectric and geothermal plants seem to be good, (I don't know a whole lot about them) but you're kind of limited as to where you can put them...
I used to work in a hydroelectric dam. They're pretty cool, but I don't think it would be fair to not mention the ecological damage caused by their construction and the accompanying flooding. You're also entirely blocking off that waterway for marine life, which may depend on it for migration.
Like any source of electricity, this one is not without its downsides.
rainwarrior wrote:I think we have a social responsibility to represent alternative means of power generation in the games we make.
Another approach which hasn't been mentioned here is to negatively depict things to which you are fundamentally opposed. Sometimes I feel this would be easier in a video game, since often times, everything that you see in a video game is something that you are supposed to destroy. A lot of video games don't have a chance in the story or gameplay to depict a positive or peaceful setting. A good example which comes to mind is Zen: Intergalactic Ninja, which is a lot like Captain Planet except that game sucks, and Zen is great.
Espozo wrote:Windmills and solar panels need to be able to store their energy when they're not being powered
One interesting approach I've read about in the past few years is to use excess power to condense nitrogen or liquid air, which can be used to store energy long-term, and can be (partially) reclaimed by use of thermal expansion.
There are also nitrogen/liquid air cars being developed and a motor which uses this in combination with diesel to attain extremely high fuel mileage. Currently, liquid nitrogen is very cheap because it's created as a by-product in the production of liquid oxygen.
lidnariq wrote:California isn't monolithic. They're the people who passed Prop 8 at the same time they elected the current president.
I don't think any area is truly monolithic in this regard and I don't think that it's fair to judge anyone based on their location without getting to know them. I actually really love the west coast for a few reasons, but I feel like I have observed some trends that are more prolific there. I feel like it's really common there to villainize southern america as a place of nothing but bigotry, but I'm sure we all know here that's not the case, and in doing so a person is stereotyping all people in a particular geographic location rather than focusing on an actual detestable problem. It's true that there is more racial tension in the south than in a lot of places in the country. It's funny though, I think, to contrast this to the pacific northwest where the general consensus is for tolerance, yet the vast majority of people are white. (At least that's how it was in Portland)