A look at a 1987 Famiclone, the 智多星70

Discuss hardware-related topics, such as development cartridges, CopyNES, PowerPak, EPROMs, or whatever.
User avatar
Tetsujin28
Posts: 15
Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2023 12:47 pm

A look at a 1987 Famiclone, the 智多星70

Post by Tetsujin28 »

This post is a mix between a showcase and documentation. I know the writing is not exactly the usual post made on this sub-board but I figured nesdev, while not exactly "neshistory", would appreciate this small peek at some relevant historical facts and artifact.

About 36 years ago, Taiwanese companies were gearing up to produce the very first Famiclones. Three companies had joined hands to get it done:
• 台興電子企業股份有限公司 (Taixing Electronics Company Co., Ltd. — TSE, a company close to TXC)
• 普澤股份有限公司 (Puze Co., Ltd. — Bit Corporation)
• 黃啓修 (Huang Qixiu — An individual related to 達摩電子有限公司, a business that had retailed MSX clones)
hally (VORC)
@hallyvorc

Okay, go back to the original subject. The pictures posted by @yungwei8 show that 神鷹128K was produced by 達摩電子有限公司. I googled the company's info and confirmed the address exactly matches to Huang's one.
EZwOD_zU4AEVQ25.png
tweet inlined by attachment fairy
They seemingly achieved their end goal around April 1987, filling out a PPU patent on the 23rd day of that month with 陳嘉旭 (Chen Jiaxu) as the credited inventor. While it is hard to tell if these three companies cloned the PPU themselves, they were quite likely the first to market it or use it commercially.

It should be noted that a company named 太欣半導 (Taixin Semiconductors, commonly known as Syntek – and that company is not the same as Taixing!) filled a lawsuit against several undisclosed individuals for leaking the silicon designs of their own clone of the CPU/PPU (KC-6005, KC-6022) in 1987. However, it is currently not known if Syntek design was reused by Bit Corp et al. or if they came up with their own.
Additionally, Nintendo filed an opposition to the patent in 1988, which was formally accepted and the patent revoked in late 1989. More details on the case are available by clicking the "Transaction Data" tab of the patent page.

With a working clone of the PPU and the CPU, Bit Corporation and TSE released their first clones in the subsequent months. Advertisements for the IQ-180 and IQ-201 began appearing starting with this one from early July 1987. Other manufacturers quickly jumped on the train the following months. Here is an advertisement for a China Television System (CTS) clone with limited run pre-orders from August 1987.
Famiclones back then were still quite expensive – the ads suggest they were just 10% cheaper than the original Famicom, a hefty sum for the Taiwanese middle class. Most clones from this period remain undocumented due to their limited outreach. And their fate of ending up in the recycle bin after all those years. Most Taiwanese game collectors would likely say they have never seen a Taiwanese model IQ-180 or IQ-201 in the wild.
hally (VORC)
@hallyvorc

Found a noteworthy old famiclone ad on 華視綜合週刊, a taiwanese tv program magazine weekly published by The Chinese Television System Inc. http://mypaper.pchome.com.tw/taiwan80/post/1306566042
124686202512.jpeg
tweet inlined by attachment fairy
While everyone remembers the Micro Genius consoles, Bit Corporation was instrumental to the worldwide spread of the Famicom in the late 80s. Young Toys in Korea rebranded the 創造者75 (Creator 75), 創造者100 (Creator 100) as the Pascar 124 and Pascar ULT respectively. The Bit72 (NES-like Creator 75) was exported to Spain, Mexico, etc. They also made (one of?) the first Famiclone with integrated BASIC, the Bit79 (playable in NintendulatorNRS).
In Taiwan, Bit Corp was mostly inconspicuous with their early Famiclones. Only the 創造者100 (model number 7600), released around 1988 and retailed up to the early 90s, may still be seen occasionally. I could go on forever, but the main point is that I don't think anyone has ever investigated nor posted a detailed photos or report of any clone console from the mid-1987. The closest is Krzysiobal's photos of an international model IQ-201 from late 1987-early 1988, using chips from what may have already been a second or third batch of PPU/CPU, the GS87007~8 pair.

image attached by attachment fairy
OA.jpg
Bit Corp.'s first Famiclone is the 智多星70 (probably translates to Wise Star, Google does not like it). It uses the same plastic mold as the 創造者50 (Creator 50, more commonly seen as the Dina 2-in-1, a SG-1000/Coleco combo). It is the direct product follow-up to the Dina 2-in-1. The first has a 7200 product code while the latter is 7300. The Bit70 (創造者70 – Creator 70) has the product code #7400 and came out slightly later and can be seen in this late 1987 photo.
i.postimg.cc-SktWfMdv-image.png
Time being retentless, there are no known surviving ads for the 7300. I don't think there has been much information shared around it. I've only seen a single photo of a junk unit years ago. I won't make the pretentious claim that it was the very first Famiclone on the market, but it was definitely in the first batch of released consoles, along with the IQ-180, IQ-201 (TW model) and some, still unknown, others that should share many similarities in term of components and design.

Full gallery, PCB shots, close-ups.

image attached by attachment fairy
PA.jpg
Manufacture date indications
• All of the ICs were manufactured before July 1987.
• The cartridge connector was manufactured by FOXCONN in the last week of June 1987.
• This motherboard shown here is revision #4 and was designed or validated in the first week of July 1987.
• The PPU and CPU lacks any distinctive product code or markings, just some sharpie pen strokes ("B", "B1"?)

Notes on the processing units:
• Duty cycles are already swapped!
• The CPU supports decimal mode. Rev0 of Duck and Othello will play correctly while Solar Jetman will show erratic behaviour before spectacularly crashing.
• The PPU operates like RP2C02E, just like the UA6528. Battletoads has no issues.
• The CPU supports DPCM samples correctly, unlike the TA-03N.
• 240pee clock test returns the standard NTSC values.
They may be identical to the recently documented GS87007 and GS87008 units.

General notes:
• The console power board expects center-positive polarity (!) Probably a reason why most of those consoles did not survive to time.
• 2nd controller has a microphone, controlled by an on/off switch rather than a linear potentiometer. Micro Genius never had a microphones, even the IQ-180. The only other I can think of are the old Aaronix models (7000, Zonic 8800, 9000).
• The console will often not power up correctly after a cold boot and lock to a cyan screen. Brown and other colors may show up as well. A soft reset, and the game will boot normally. I suspect a capacitor may be rather weak.
• The plastic around the cartridge slot is clipped to the shell, it was certainly designed that way so they could share the same injection mold and use a different slot to fit Coleco cartridges dimensions.

While it is not yet exactly clear how UMC landed in the Famiclone domain, we know from this lawsuit with Centronics that they publicly announced their PPU in July 1987 and marketed it soon after. Since the chips showcased here feature the same behaviours as UA6527 and 6528, chances are they were likel involved from the start or rather quickly inherited the productions masks.

Huge thanks to @hallyvorc for a lot of information in this post. You will hear much more detailed stories and facts by following their Twitter and ordering their books covering Taiwanese console patents and trademarks.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
User avatar
forple
Posts: 55
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 2:09 pm

Re: A look at a 1987 Famiclone, the 智多星70

Post by forple »

• The CPU supports DPCM samples correctly, unlike the TA-03N.
This is minor and pedantic, but this isn't correct. TA-03N supports DPCM correctly. Most units with it have terrible audio amplifiers. When placed into a genuine HVC-CPU-07 board, It's literally functionally identical to a standard 2A03G. The only difference between the two is in the illegal opcode set, otherwise they are pure die-mask clones of each other. Same applies to the TA-02N PPU, but even moreso. If you want a hardware recording, I will gladly provide one.

--
Also, ERA Tech made a Famiclone from 1987. Those use the "KP2B03E" and "02" CPU and PPU chips, respectively. We don't know anything about the functionality of those chips, but it and the console do exist. Seems to be from the same era, possibly earlier, as it's widely considered to be the earliest known Famiclone.
Last edited by forple on Wed Apr 05, 2023 7:41 pm, edited 4 times in total.
Guest34546

Re: A look at a 1987 Famiclone, the 智多星70

Post by Guest34546 »

Thanks for this very interesting and informative post! I love learning about these old clone systems and how they relate to each other. Hope to see more of this sort of stuff, I know there's already been quite a lot of posts recently about clone chipsets.

I'd love to know how the duty cycle swapping happened. I've wondered if, since the duty cycle patterns on the NES CPU are stored on a small mask ROM, if they changed it to evade copyright law. But I'm not sure if such a small piece of data would fall under copyright law.
Last edited by Guest34546 on Mon Dec 04, 2023 9:32 am, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
forple
Posts: 55
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 2:09 pm

Re: A look at a 1987 Famiclone, the 智多星70

Post by forple »

From a die shot of the UA6527 chips, It seems the chip's layout was totally redone, so it may have been by sheer accident; I doubt such a small table could be copyrighted, but it wouldn't surprise me if UMC for some reason didn't want to take that gamble (although they already did so with the entire PPU design, lol). I say that because the AY8930 uses a similar principle for its own pulse waves in extended mode, if I'm not mistaken, but with 2 extra pulse widths.

--

I should have said this in my main post. This little bit of history is really freakin cool, honestly. Very amazed how multiple companies gave this a shot in 1987, or really just thought about cloning Nintendo's console in the first place.
Guest34546

Re: A look at a 1987 Famiclone, the 智多星70

Post by Guest34546 »

forple wrote: Sun Apr 02, 2023 10:12 pm Very amazed how multiple companies gave this a shot in 1987, or really just thought about cloning Nintendo's console in the first place.
I think it's really cool how they managed to clone a current generation console. You just don't see that today.
User avatar
Tetsujin28
Posts: 15
Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2023 12:47 pm

Re: A look at a 1987 Famiclone, the 智多星70

Post by Tetsujin28 »

forple wrote: Sun Apr 02, 2023 3:59 pm This is minor and pedantic, but this isn't correct. TA-03N supports DPCM correctly. [...]
--
Also, ERA Tech made a Famiclone from 1987. Those use the "KP2B03E" and "02" CPU and PPU chips, respectively. We don't know anything about the functionality of those chips, but it and the console do exist. Seems to be from the same era, possibly earlier, as it's widely considered to be the earliest known Famiclone.
I don't believe the audio amplifier trope to be true when Klax sounds like this on my Good Boy. It would be seen with UA6527 too then, as manufacturers often used the chips interchangeably for given models. I had my Good Boy sent for repair and the person could never fix the DPCM issues, even with a new custom audio amplifier circuit. It is just broken, and I suspect at least a production batch to be affected if there are other reports.
--
We do not know exactly which came first. There are mention of a novel "智多星" home computer system in Bit Corp 創造者 (7000) manual from (late?) 1986. I have never heard of any other 智多星 console or system by Bit Corporation beside the 智多星100, which is identical to the 創造者100.
I have highlighted the line that mentions briefly the existence of a 智多星 home computer system.
(attachment fairy attached image)
i.postimg.cc-M6ZNnDVT-bitcorpzhuidong.jpg
(Albeit Bit Corp registered the 智多星 in late 1984, so maybe there is an undocumented Bit Corp micro computer under that name !)
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
User avatar
forple
Posts: 55
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 2:09 pm

Re: A look at a 1987 Famiclone, the 智多星70

Post by forple »

Looking at the whole thing again; I'm convinced your console is using a UMC chip. Unless this "TA" absolutely botched making stolen die-mask clones of real 2A03G chips for a certain unknown batch, and/or your CPU happened to get mishandled or damaged, I have 0 idea how this would happen. This is what Klax sounds like on my own TA-03N.
Tetsujin28 wrote: Tue Apr 04, 2023 12:39 pm I had my Good Boy sent for repair and the person could never fix the DPCM issues, even with a new custom audio amplifier circuit.
Well, they didn't replace the actual problematic component; the CPU. You could give it the best audio circuit in the world, and the thing would still produce garbage.
User avatar
Tetsujin28
Posts: 15
Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2023 12:47 pm

Re: A look at a 1987 Famiclone, the 智多星70

Post by Tetsujin28 »

No, it was definitely a real TA-03N, without swapped duty cycles or anything that would suggest a UMC clone. And I never had any issue with DPCM on discrete UMC CPUs (NTSC ones, that is). Anyhow, let's not drift the topic any further.
Since it is free, here's Klax on the 智多星70.
User avatar
Tetsujin28
Posts: 15
Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2023 12:47 pm

Re: A look at a 1987 Famiclone, the 智多星70

Post by Tetsujin28 »

I could not cover just a single console of one of the two large entities were responsible for cloning the Famicom. So after Bit Corp's, here is 台興電子企業股份有限公司 (Taixing Electronics) first commercial take, the original 小天才 IQ-201. It was distributed by 大仁電子股份有限公司 (Taejan Electronics), which was certainly a company set up by Taixing.

Image Image

I don't think there is much else to cover historically. Here are a set of photos showcasing the unit and its internals:
Full gallery, PCB shots, close-ups

Amazingly, someone was kind enough to scan and publicly share the Taiwanese manual of that model, as well as a photo of the outer box. Additionally, there exists two revisions of the IQ-201. The first (alternate) was seemingly meant to be distributed internationally a few months after the showcased model. It lacks the clock and replaces all of the chinese text with english. The second revision was distributed in selected PAL countries like China and Vietnam around the early 90s.

- Interestingly, the CPU and PPU don't have any markings but the PPU is stamped with "T P003". It of course has the same chips with decimal mode and swapped duty cycles.
- The front panel clock is entirely independant from the unit. It is powered by a small button cell battery and controlled by two buttons on the right of the panel.

Now, a small comparison between the two with pros and cons:
- Bit Corp's AV are much better. But the rough shape of the IQ-201 unit does not play in its favor. While the DC leaks in the audio path for the 智多星70 (leading to a buzz), the IQ-201 audio mixing seem quite subpar, and the video gain is not as pronounced, leading to a slightly darker picture. ad_sound_demo: 智多星70 vs 小天才 IQ-201
- Bit Corp's has to be one of the only Famiclone that expects a center positive PSU. No wonder so few survived. IQ-201 is center negative, as expected.
- The design of the 智多星70 is very elegant but the plastic appears to be quite fragile. It is as if Bit Corp chose to go for a luxury product that would fit nicely next to the rest of the AV appliance at home, while Taixing thought from the get go that the console would be used by kids, so the IQ-201 case had to be sturdy. In that regard, it is much closer to the Famicom.
- The IQ-201 controllers are just like the Famicom. Bit Corp octogonal directional-pad is not that great and the buttons are slightly mushy. But it could be due to the age of the unit.
- The Bit Corp unit gets hot. The thin design lacks air vent, leading to rapid heat accumulation. On the contrary, the IQ-201 has air vents everywhere.
- The IQ-201 goes as far as having the exact same controller cord length to the original Famicom. Bit Corp was a tad more generous.

How does it compares to the original Famicom? A photo always speak a thousand words:
Image
User avatar
Tetsujin28
Posts: 15
Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2023 12:47 pm

Re: A look at a 1987 Famiclone, the 智多星70

Post by Tetsujin28 »

I thought the 1987 adventure would have come to an end with that Taiwanese IQ-201, but this 創造者70 ("Creator 70") is adding valuable informations!
Image

This Bit Corp. Creator 70 motherboard predates the one found in the 智多星70 unit discussed in the first post. A possible coincidence and evidence that both models were produced at the same time, with that specific 智多星70 unit manufactured a few months after that 創造者70.

Anyhow, the board claims to be "REV3", while the 智多星70 is "REV4" and has 8716 imprinted, rather than 8727. 8716 translates to week 16, 1987: April 13-19. It preceeds by a week the application date of the PPU patent (April 23)! The design is mostly identical between the two revisions, just a few capacitors missing in the mask.
Image Image

Anyhow, if boards were available by May, it is almost a certainty that the very first (Bit Corp.) clones did hit the market by June or July. Moreover, the July PCB revision was likely made using feedback from the REV3 production run.
KirbyGod
Posts: 8
Joined: Wed Oct 30, 2024 7:03 am

Re: A look at a 1987 Famiclone, the 智多星70

Post by KirbyGod »

The Bit-79 computer from Bit corp had a menu when it started up. Famicom cart or Basic. Does anyone know of any programs that actually run? It also had ports. Has anyone actually used the ports? Can you load programs from tape, floppy, etc. Do flash carts or multi carts work on this?

Such an awesome famiclone. So many questions. Someone needs to make a video.
NewRisingSun
Posts: 1593
Joined: Thu May 19, 2005 11:30 am

Re: A look at a 1987 Famiclone, the 智多星70

Post by NewRisingSun »

NintendulatorNRS emulates the menu, BASIC, tape load/save and printer of the Bit-79 computer. Don't know about any other ports functionality, and the manual says nothing about floppy disk support.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
arcequesea
Posts: 2
Joined: Sat Nov 29, 2025 7:11 pm

Re: A look at a 1987 Famiclone, the 智多星70

Post by arcequesea »

I want to share with you all that I have one of the Bit 70 code 7400.
20251129_193249.jpg
I recently recovered it from my old house and I'm working on fixing it. (I connected the wrong voltage to it and burnt the first capacitor that catches that voltage.)
If anyone needs pictures from other angles, insides or what ever. Let me know.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
User avatar
Tetsujin28
Posts: 15
Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2023 12:47 pm

Re: A look at a 1987 Famiclone, the 智多星70

Post by Tetsujin28 »

Very cool! Pay attention to the voltage and the polarity. The two Bit Corp consoles I've shown here (7300, 7400) expect center positive: the opposite polarity than the regular Famicom. I don't know when Bit Corp ended their foolishness and opted for the regular polarity.

May I ask where this unit comes from? So far the "BIT 70" branded unit are only confirmed to have been sold in Russia. But they were eventually used in Mexico & others, with the original branding hidden by stickers. Later units (early 1990?) replaces the controllers' turbo sliders with turbo buttons.

Is there any serial number on the underside?
arcequesea
Posts: 2
Joined: Sat Nov 29, 2025 7:11 pm

Re: A look at a 1987 Famiclone, the 智多星70

Post by arcequesea »

This was acquired in the south Mexico. In a very popular imported electronics store.
Thanks for the advise about the polarity. That may also have been the cause of the burnout.