After that I mentioned hobbies. For example my mom taught herself to touch up old family photos with photo editing software and has bought other old items to touch up such as sewing patterns.tepples wrote:For one of the critics, it's often housework. (Not that I don't do my own share.)
Naturally photoshopping is a marketable skill, but the stretch from what she does now to a "real" job in graphic design is similar to the stretch from coding NES logic to programming machinery, software development, web coding etc.
Then the only real answer is that it cannot be justified to people who believe this.tepples wrote:They consider programming for an obsolete computer to be "play", not resume-worthy work, because one cannot sell copies of a program for an obsolete computer in commercially significant quantities unless you happen to live in the same town as one of the makers of handheld TV games such as Jakks or Radica. And my cousin doesn't finish much of anything in part because I haven't yet got him to care about filling a resume.
If I am or reasonably could be making money from it, no. For example, fixing PCs made in the past decade is work; fixing C64s is play.UncleSporky wrote:Suppose you were spending all day building computers and installing OSs, would they frown on that?
Doing an activity that "won't sell" does not equate to something that has no value. There are possibly more worthy pursuits, but there will always be more worthy pursuits than whatever you are currently doing. You could also be doing a lot worse.