Posted: Fri Dec 04, 2009 1:01 pm
For reference, NTSC aspect correction is roughly 1.148936:1. Varies per TV and all that. With that in mind, here's some aspect ratios for input video:
184x160 = 1.31875:1 (closest to 4:3 = 1.333)
224x160 = 1.60625:1 (closest to 16:10 = 1.600)
248x160 = 1.78125:1 (closest to 16:9 = 1.777)
And of course you can cut off individual pixels to get it even closer, but you're still using the same tile sizes.
184x160 = 1.31875:1 (closest to 4:3 = 1.333)
224x160 = 1.60625:1 (closest to 16:10 = 1.600)
248x160 = 1.78125:1 (closest to 16:9 = 1.777)
And of course you can cut off individual pixels to get it even closer, but you're still using the same tile sizes.
I can easily fit that on a DVD for an extra few pennies a copy. Otherwise no, I'd have to add a video codec.tepples wrote:Will you be able to fit 90 minutes of footage on a CD like Night Trap did?
And nothing's stopping you from making more 90-second Mode 7 128x64 videos while the rest of us make awesome improvements to existing classics and potentially even entirely new software titles that should hopefully be possible on the real thing (and cheap to produce) as soon as we can find a willing hardware dev :)tepples wrote:Yes. People who care about program efficiency, not the inevitable outcome of Moore's law of IC density, want to see what can be done with hardware that was affordable when the platform was designed.