Windows 7 or vista..?
Moderator: Moderators
-
mikerickin
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Sat Jan 09, 2010 5:18 am
Windows 7 or vista..?
Hi to all
I am planning to buy new laptop.But confused little which system to buy.So please share your experience so i can get some ideas.which one is better..?
I am planning to buy new laptop.But confused little which system to buy.So please share your experience so i can get some ideas.which one is better..?
Last edited by mikerickin on Thu Jan 21, 2010 11:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Windows 7 or vista..?
Ubuntu. It will free your mind.mikerickin wrote:I am planning to buy new laptop.But confused little which system to buy.
...at least from the control of this bot.
Re: Windows 7 or vista..?
No love for Debian?tepples wrote:Ubuntu. It will free your mind.mikerickin wrote:I am planning to buy new laptop.But confused little which system to buy.
...at least from the control of this bot.
Until they start making things that are NOT compatible. XP is only compatible because a lot of stuff has been made for it, but that will soon stop, sadly...Zepper wrote:absolutely compatible.
Let's just hope ReactOS gets real good real soon!
Re: Windows 7 or vista..?
Ubuntu is brown Debian, so that too.danntor wrote:No love for Debian?tepples wrote:Ubuntu. It will free your mind.
tokumaru: When companies stop making drivers for Windows XP, they'll also stop making drivers for ReactOS.
Re: Windows 7 or vista..?
True. Hopefully it will evolve into something better than Vista/7 while still compatible with them? I'm truly lost when it comes to new OSs... I definitely don't want to leave XP for a new Windows, but several programs I absolutely need in order to live don't work on Linux. I would really like to switch to Linux, but besides not being able to use several important programs, I suck at understanding how it works (I can't even install the drivers to get all my hardware working!).tepples wrote:When companies stop making drivers for Windows XP, they'll also stop making drivers for ReactOS.
for running windows apps if your computer has decent power and you can't get it to run using wine, Vmware Server, or Virtualbox should work assuming you can't just find a Linux equivalent of whatever it is.tokumaru wrote: but several programs I absolutely need in order to live don't work on Linux.
More often than not you don't need to install drivers useing Linux what in particular is the devices?tokumaru wrote:I suck at understanding how it works (I can't even install the drivers to get all my hardware working!).
btw I like Linux mint, its basically Ubuntu made nice.
Command lines are not all that often required for normal stuff anymore, at least not much more that I have to use DOS. its true that Ubuntu and others dose not come with "restricted-extras" (for legal reasons because they do sell copy's of there OS they would have to pay the owners license fees (also is bit of nonsense from the developers bc they don't want to include certain things due to there panties being in a bunch) but its not necessary to use any commands to install them. This is a common misconception from people who have not tried out Linux themselves. once more my recommendation is mint.phazmatis wrote:User: "But I still can't play my DVDs without learning how to use the command line.".
Linux can run "Live" from the cd without the need to install it try it out yourself b4 you comment on it again.
Actually, I'm running Ubuntu 9.04 right now. I'd also be running linux on my desktop, but linux has this nice habit of installing just fine and then giving me a blank screen once I try to boot it from the actual hard drive. I've tried Ubuntu, Debian, Fedora, and Slackware, with identical results. Probably my motherboard or graphics card are not supported, but I'm not going to replace hardware to get linux working. Oh, I tried the common linux boot options, and none of them fix the problem. I'll just stick with XP, which installs all of my drivers without any trouble.peppers wrote:Command lines are not all that often required for normal stuff anymore, at least not much more that I have to use DOS. This is a common misconception from people who have not tried out Linux themselves. once more my recommendation is mint.phazmatis wrote:User: "But I still can't play my DVDs without learning how to use the command line.".
Linux can run "Live" from the cd without the need to install it try it out yourself b4 you comment on it again.
I'm using 64-bit linux, and there are problems associated with that. For example, all of the flash player plugins are either 32-bit exclusive or require all sorts of contortions to install them. Someone makes an install script, but the next version of ubuntu breaks them. Ubuntu 9.04 finally got the video working in this laptop, it was a nightmare of restricted drivers that didn't install correctly before.
Windows 7 is still pretty bad. Web browsers freeze up for 30 seconds at a time any time I open too many (4 or more) youtube pages (on a dual-core 3.2ghz desktop this should not be happening). Games run at one half the framerate as in XP. And even when I lower the graphics settings in games, and bring the framerate up to 60+, the games jerk and lag like they did in Vista. XP runs them fine.
I use linux for online banking because windows security is a joke. XP, Vista, 7,.. I don't trust any of them. The only secure windows PC is behind an actual firewall (not a crappy residential router that will happily pass any forged packet marked "192.168.1.4" along to your desktop), running a non-Norton (and non-McAfee) antivirus with COMODO firewall (or some other competent firewall) set on "paranoid mode". And then don't ever use flash, acrobat, javascript, etc.............
Re: Windows 7 or vista..?
What medical devices that you use run on Windows?tokumaru wrote:several programs I absolutely need in order to live don't work on Linux.
The stakeholders in DVD Video (MPEG-LA, DVD CCA, and the movie publishers) don't want you playing DVDs on unauthorized devices, and Linux isn't yet popular enough to make Linux PCs in general into authorized devices. Even Mac OS X, which is much more popular on the desktop than Linux, can't play Blu-ray Disc because of the format's digital restrictions management demands. (Get a PS3.) Still, Dell PCs with Ubuntu sold in the United States come with licensed DVD playback software.phazmatis wrote:User: "But I still can't play my DVDs without learning how to use the command line."
Virtual machines are good at running applications, but there are two drawbacks. First, you have to buy a retail copy of the operating system. In the United States, a retail copy of Windows costs about $200, but a Wii-size Acer Aspire Revo PC including a keyboard, a mouse, and a bundled OEM copy of Windows also costs $200. So you might as well buy a KVM switch instead of Parallels Desktop or VMware or whatever. Second, virtual machines often don't perfectly forward an emulated device driver's direct hardware access to the actual hardware, so good luck using USB peripherals such as a label printer or a receipt printer or a webcam.peppers wrote:for running windows apps if your computer has decent power and you can't get it to run using wine, Vmware Server, or Virtualbox should work assuming you can't just find a Linux equivalent of whatever it is.
Microtek ScanMaker 4850 USB flatbed scanner, listed on sane-project.org as unsupported for years. On another PC back in the Mandrake 9.1 days, it was the Radeon 9000 video card. I bet that's supported by now, but now that's my only Windows machine and I don't feel like taking two minutes to switch between applications. But I bought my current laptop (ASUS Eee PC 900) specifically because it was the cheapest one I could find locally that would run Linux well.phazmatis wrote:what in particular is the devices?