Posted: Sun Sep 12, 2010 5:56 pm
Xious, quit playing the victim or someone might accuse you of being a quack-troll hiding behind novella-sized posts of jargon.
Everything I said was warranted and since it appears I must, I'll spend the next hour writing out the points:
-Your "colorful" writing style is not pretentious, this is: "you've probably never seen anywhere else" as is your disclaimer, as is the use of the word "comprehensive" and telling your audience to "enjoy" [your work].
-You act strangely biased against the official schematic (even though at least 6 of Enri's schematics are made redundant by it), yet have it in your archive. Particularly before your edit you had stressed its commonality--which doesn't matter from an educational standpoint. You also nitpick(ed) the schematic's low quality and incompleteness, which I found ludicrous, so I made a statement about it.
-You are not alone in having access to exotic Japanese sites or the ability to use a web translator so it would be wise to not presume. I for one found the site through SMS Power, an English-language site which links it on the homepage.
-What you have (/had) to gain was reputation from your "work" in either community. You seek credit in this very thread: "please only credit me for them as a contributor", coincidentally being modest after I posted my reply to the other message board.
-Regarding the oscillator thread: I too have the disability of being a "westerner" and I have no problem making out the kana. But I have a history with the language. Some of the kanji is illegible to someone without the ability infer the radicals (such as myself) but the text is irrelevant here; your explanation made no sense. I strongly suggest learning some electrical theory and terminology instead of sharing your own reasoning and language. Lack of knowledge isn't an excuse for a disability, but fabricating stuff like that which wastes everybody's time, including your own, is sure a sign of one.
Bottom line: to avoid "confusion" in future discussions you should cite sources for work collected by you or stop promoting and publishing unfinished projects when they still have dubious integrity. It would be very wise to *demonstrate* your motives, using the sources you collect from as an example, for any other knuckleheaded readers.
I had my fun, I'm done.
Everything I said was warranted and since it appears I must, I'll spend the next hour writing out the points:
-Your "colorful" writing style is not pretentious, this is: "you've probably never seen anywhere else" as is your disclaimer, as is the use of the word "comprehensive" and telling your audience to "enjoy" [your work].
-You act strangely biased against the official schematic (even though at least 6 of Enri's schematics are made redundant by it), yet have it in your archive. Particularly before your edit you had stressed its commonality--which doesn't matter from an educational standpoint. You also nitpick(ed) the schematic's low quality and incompleteness, which I found ludicrous, so I made a statement about it.
-You are not alone in having access to exotic Japanese sites or the ability to use a web translator so it would be wise to not presume. I for one found the site through SMS Power, an English-language site which links it on the homepage.
-What you have (/had) to gain was reputation from your "work" in either community. You seek credit in this very thread: "please only credit me for them as a contributor", coincidentally being modest after I posted my reply to the other message board.
-Regarding the oscillator thread: I too have the disability of being a "westerner" and I have no problem making out the kana. But I have a history with the language. Some of the kanji is illegible to someone without the ability infer the radicals (such as myself) but the text is irrelevant here; your explanation made no sense. I strongly suggest learning some electrical theory and terminology instead of sharing your own reasoning and language. Lack of knowledge isn't an excuse for a disability, but fabricating stuff like that which wastes everybody's time, including your own, is sure a sign of one.
Bottom line: to avoid "confusion" in future discussions you should cite sources for work collected by you or stop promoting and publishing unfinished projects when they still have dubious integrity. It would be very wise to *demonstrate* your motives, using the sources you collect from as an example, for any other knuckleheaded readers.
I had my fun, I'm done.
), and maybe a couple things from the (really old) NESdev mail list.
